SMEs in Bangladesh and their Financing: An analysis and some Recommendations.


Jointly Prepared by -

Md. Shamsul Alam, MA, MBA, and Md. Anwar Ullah, M.Com, MBA, ACMA

(Published in The Cost and Management Journal, Vol.34 No.3, May-June 2006, pp 57-72.)

http://www.goodgovernancebd.org/link/Good%20governance%20studies/Articles%20from%20Internet/SME%207/Anwar.pdf

 

ABSRTACT

Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are accounting for 25 per cent of GDP, 80 per cent of industrial jobs, and 25 per cent of the total labor force in Bangladesh even though the prospective sector gets negligible facilitation from different support service providers. There are various constraints that hinder the development of SMEs in Bangladesh, such as lack of medium-to long-term credit, limited access to market opportunities, technology, and expertise and business information. Lack of suitable incentives, inefficient and limited services from relevant government agencies as well as poor capacity of entrepreneurs are other reasons for the slow growth of SMEs. Obviously, the government has many things to do to flourish the SMEs because, if they flourish, SMEs will create new entrepreneurs, generate more jobs and contribute to a great Extent to the national economy.

1. Introduction

In almost every part of the world, limited access to finance is considered a key constraint to private sector growth. This is especially true for SMEs of our country as they are facing different types of problems for availing institutional finance though SMEs play dominantly important role in the national economy of Bangladesh by making up over 90 per cent of industrial enterprises, providing employment to 4 out of 5 industrial workers and contributing to over one-third of industrial value-added to GDP. The relative SME share in manufacturing value-added is much higher and estimated to vary between 45 to 50 per cent of totaling value-added generated by the manufacturing industries sector. Further as important sources of new business creation and developing new entrepreneurial talents, these industries provide the much needed dynamism and vitality to the national economy.

Implementation of poverty alleviation action programs and strategies is a systematic and continuous effort in Bangladesh. For that purpose, the Poverty Reduction Strategy of the government has clearly identified some core principles and parameters both at macro and micro levels for reducing the existing poverty level at least half within 2015 as targeted in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).  Rapid and sustainable growth of SMEs is undoubtedly one vehicle for accelerating national economic growth to the point of having a measurable impact in the way of reduction of poverty and unemployment, generation of more employment. More than 90% of the industrial enterprises in Bangladesh are in the SME size-class. Generally, SMEs are labor intensive with relatively low capital intensity. The SME also posses a character of privilege as cost effective and comparative cost advantages in nature.  The SME policy strategies have been formulated to assist in the achievement of the goals and targets the MDGs set by the Government. The contribution of SMEs to the national economy is shown in the table - 1.   

Table-1: Contribution Large and Small Industries to the GDP (%)

 

1999-00

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

Large Industry

11.01

11.13

11.16

11.29

11.47

Small Industry

4.39

4.46

4.60

4.68

4.78

Total Industry

15.40

15.59

15.76

15.97

16.25

(Source: Economic Review, Ministry of Finance, GOB, 2004)

2. SME defined in Bangladesh

Until recently, public policy did not distinguish medium enterprises as a separate category and instead lumped it with large enterprises. Thus, industrial policies prior to 1999 divided the industrial sector into three categories — large, small and cottage. The cut-off limit of these size categories was determined on the basis of the size of fixed assets. Thus, the Industrial Policy 1991 defined “Small Industry” as industrial undertakings whose total fixed investment excluding the price of land, expenses for inland transportation and commissioning of machinery and appliances, and duties and taxes, was limited to Tk. 30 million (US $800 thousand) including initial working capital, while the upper limit on the investment level in “Cottage Industry” was Tk. 500,000 (US $13 thousand).

In contrast, the Industrial Policy 1999 distinguished medium from large industry and defined the size categories in terms of both capital and employment size. Thus, Large Industry” was defined to include all industrial enterprises having 100 or more workers and/or having a fixed capital of over Taka 300 million (US $6 million). Medium industry covered enterprises employing between 50 and 99 workers and/or with a fixed capital investment between Taka. 100-300 million (US $2-6 million). ‘Small Industry” meant enterprises having fewer than 50 workers excluding the cottage units and/or with a fixed capital investment of less than Taka. 100 million (US $2 million). “Cottage Industry” covered household-based units operated mainly with family labor.

However, in the latest industrial policy announced in 2005, significant changes have been brought about in the definition of the various size categories. In the Industrial Policy 2005, a distinction has been made between manufacturing and non-manufacturing enterprises. In the case of the manufacturing enterprises, sizes have been defined in terms of the value of the fixed assets while in the case of the non-manufacturing enterprises the cut-off line has been identified in terms of employment size.

Thus, large industry is now defined as units with fixed capital of more than Tk. 100 million (US $1.6 million) excluding the value of land and building while non manufacturing large enterprise is defined as units having more than 100 workers. Medium industry is defined as units with fixed capital of Tk. 15-100 million (US $246 thousand - $1.6 million) excluding the value of land and building while non 4 manufacturing medium enterprises are those with employment size between 25 and 100 workers. Manufacturing enterprises with fixed assets of less than Tk. 15 million excluding the value of land and non-manufacturing enterprises with fewer than 25 workers are to be treated as small enterprise.

While the definition of SME has changed overtime in different Industrial Policy pronouncements, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), which is the prime national organization responsible for generating and compiling various types of statistics in the country has been consistently using an all together different classificatory scheme. Thus, BBS defines enterprises having 10-49 workers as “Medium” industries while those having 50 or more workers are identified as “Large” industries. For industrial GDP data, the medium and large industries are lumped together under “Large” category. The rest of the industrial enterprises including cottage industries are grouped under the “Small” category.

3. Present Status of the SME Sector in Bangladesh

Size, Type and Spread of SME

Because of the definitional problems mentioned above, information on SME is not readily available in Bangladesh. BBS conducts annual surveys of the manufacturing sector, called the Census of Manufacturing Industry (CMI), but as mentioned earlier the BBS lumps under the “Large” category information on all units with 50 or more workers and hence the information cannot be separated in most cases for the 50-99 workers size category, which is the more commonly used cut-off size limit for medium enterprises. Moreover, there is quite a bit of backlog in the processing of the CMI data. The latest available published CMI report is for the period 1999-2000. The prime agency for the promotion of small and cottage industries in Bangladesh is the Bangladesh Small & Cottage Industries Corporation (BSCIC). BSCIC is required to maintain information and data bank on small and cottage industries in Bangladesh and accordingly the agency carries out nation-wide surveys of the sector at some time intervals. However, the latest such survey by BSCIC was conducted in the late 1980s and it was based on the definition of small and cottage industries given in the earlier industrial policies that used capital rather than employment size as the cut-off limit. Fortunately, BBS carried out a nation wide census of all non-farm economic activities in 2001 and 2003 and a preliminary report based on the census has been made available recently (BBS 2005). The report presents data by employment size category but there is no information on the size of fixed assets. The previous such national census of non-farm economic activities was carried out by the BBS in 1986. Information available from the recent BBS report has been presented in Table-2. The following appears to be the main features of this sector in Bangladesh:

Table 2 : Size and Composition of SME in Bangladesh – 2001/03

 

Micro <10

Small 10-49

Medium 50-99

SME 10-99

Large 100+

Total 10+

All

No. of Establishment (thousand)

3489

75

5

80

6

86

3575

As % of all

97.61

2.09

0.14

2.23

0.16

2.39

100

As % of 10+

-

87.36

6.00

93.36

6.64

100

-

Rural-urban distribution (%) of units

Urban

35.45

60.06

73.64

60.93

83.10

62.40

36.09

Rural

64.55

39.94

26.36

39.07

16.90

37.60

63.91

All

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Scrotal composition (%) of units

Manufacturing

12.63

34.82

45.09

35.48

66.44

37.53

13.22

Wholesale & retail trade

58.18

8.84

4.25

8.55

1.99

8.11

56.99

Hotels & restaurants

6.55

4.59

1.46

4.39

0.72

4.15

6.50

Comm. & personal service

12.91

3.11

3.65

3.14

2.22

3.08

12.68

Health & social work

1.42

2.97

6.30

3.19

5.27

3.33

1.46

Transport & commutation

2.45

2.46

2.97

2.50

1.73

2.45

2.45

Other services

5.86

43.21

36.28

42.75

25.61

41.35

6.7

All

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Size of Employment (thousand)

8119

1375

343

1718

2192

3910

12029

As % of all

67.50

11.43

2.85

14.28

18.22

32.50

100

As % of 10+

 

35.17

8.77

43.94

56.06

100

-

Rural-urban distribution (%) of units

Urban

39.96

61.27

73.78

63.76

88.01

77.36

52.11

Rural

60.04

38.73

26.22

36.24

11.99

22.64

47.89

All

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Scrotal composition (%) of employment

Manufacturing

18.55

35.50

45.53

37.50

72.07

56.85

31.01

Wholesale & retail trade

50.77

7.56

4.16

6.88

1.24

3.72

35.18

Hotels & restaurants

7.34

4.23

1.40

3.67

0.38

1.83

5.55

Comm. & personal service

10.77

3.08

3.53

3.17

1.98

2.50

8.08

Health & social work

1.44

3.26

6.43

3.89

3.86

3.87

2.23

Transport &  Comm.

2.14

2.38

3.02

2.51

1.72

2.07

2.12

Other services

8.99

43.99

35.93

42.38

18.75

29.16

15.53

All

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Source : Economic Census 2001 & 2003, National Report (Preliminary), Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, July 2005

Changes in the Size and Structure of SME over time

A comparison of the data from the Economic Census 2001 & 2003 with the data from the previous census of 1986 (Table 3) suggests that the importance of the SME sector has changed marginally during the inter-census period.

• The share of SME in the number of establishments in the 10+ size group has slightly declined from 95.6% in 1986 to 93.4% in 2001/03 while the share in employment came down from 49.8% to 43.9%.

• The urban SME employment grew at an annual rate of 4.6°/ raising the share of urban SME in the employment in 10+ size group from 57% in 1986 to 63.8% in 200.

• Non-manufacturing SME grew at a higher rate during the period causing the share of manufacturing n SME employment to decline from 41, 3% in 1986 to 37.5% 2001/03.

Table 3 : Size and Composition of SME in Bangladesh – 1986

 

Micro <10

Small 10-49

Medium 50-99

SME 10-99

Large 100+

Total 10+

All

No. of Establishment (thousand)

2117

47

2

49

2

51

2168

As % of all

97.62

2.16

0.11

2.27

0.11

2.38

100.00

As % of 10+

-

90.88

4.67

95.55

4.45

100

 

Rural-urban distribution (%) of units

Urban

35.97

54.04

63.10

54.49

71.68

55.25

36.43

Rural

64.03

45.96

36.90

45.51

28.32

44.75

63.57

All

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Sectoral composition  (%) of units

Manufacturing

24.21

33.08

62.72

34.53

80.64

36.58

24.50

Wholesale & retail trade

49.32

16.23

6.23

15.74

2.74

15.16

48.50

Finance & Business service

2.47

13.37

9.09

13.16

6.52

12.86

2.72

Other services

24.00

37.33

21.96

36.58

10.09

35.40

24.27

All

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Size of Employment (thousand)

5316

779

164

943

949

1892

7208

As % of all

73.75

10.80

2.27

13.07

13.17

26.25

100.00

As % of 10+

-

41.17

8.66

49.83

50.17

100

-

Rural-urban distribution  (%) of units

Urban

36.92

55.34

62.93

56.66

73.58

65.15

44.33

Rural

63.08

44.66

37.07

43.34

26.42

34.85

55.67

All

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Sectoral composition  (%) of employment

Manufacturing

35.19

36.75

63.07

41.33

87.82

64.65

42.92

Wholesale & retail trade

42.14

14.42

6.08

12.97

1.62

7.28

32.99

Finance & Business service

2.46

13.13

9.06

12.42

4.38

8.39

4.02

Other services

20.21

35.70

21.79

33.28

6.18

19.68

20.07

All

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Source : Bangladesh Census of Non-farm Economic Activities 1986, National Report, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, November 1989

Size and Structure of Manufacturing SME

The evidence from the Economic Census 2001 & 2003 (Table‑4) shows that small manufacturing in Bangladesh consists of some 26 thousand enterprises employing nearly 488 thousand persons while there are some 2311 manufacturing establishments under the medium category engaging about 156 thousand persons. In the 10+ size group, manufacturing SMEs account for nearly 88% of the manufacturing establishments but about 29% of manufacturing employment. The Economic Census did not have information on value added. However, other sources (Osmani 1995) suggest that the share of 5MB in manufacturing value added in Bangladesh in the 10+ group is likely to be around 26%. The small manufacturing enterprises are almost evenly distributed between rural and urban areas both in terms of number of establishment and employment. But in the case of medium manufacturing enterprises there is a higher incidence of urban establishment and urban employment.

Table 4 : Size and Composition of Manufacturing SME in Bangladesh 2001/03

 

Micro <10

Small 10-49

Medium 50-99

SME 10-99

Large 100+

Total 10+

All

No. of Establishment (thousand)

440

26

2

28

4

32

472

As % of all

93.2

5.5

0.5

6.0

0.8

6.8

100.0

As % of 10+

 

81.0

7.2

82.2

11.8

100.0

 

Rural-urban distribution (%) of units

Urban

26.4

51.7

57.0

52.1

79.5

55.4

28.4

Rural

73.6

48.3

43.0

47.9

20.5

44.6

71.6

All

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Size of Employment (thousand)

1506

488

156

644

1580

2224

3730

As % of all

40.4

13.1

4.2

17.3

42.3

59.6

100.0

As % of 10+

 

22.0

7.0

29.0

71.0

100

 

Rural-urban distribution (%) of employment

Urban

31.6

51.4

57.1

52.8

86.5

76.7

58.5

Rural

68.4

48.6

42.9

47.2

13.5

23.3

41.5

All

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

 Source : Economic Census 2001 & 2003, National Report (Preliminary),  Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, July 2005

The evidence from the Economic Census on the composition of manufacturing SME (Table‑3) suggests textiles, non-metallic mineral such as brick and clay products, food products, furniture, and plastic products as dominant industry categories.

4. SMEs access to finance

Among the many compelling reasons why SMEs fail to realize their full potential, inadequate access to finance is prominent and most commonly cited. With limited capital base of their own and little or no access to institutional financing they rely on inefficient financing service traditionally from informal sources, which eventually proves unsustainable let alone stimulate growth.

In the past, government has attempted to provide small and medium enterprises with access to finance through targeted lending. There was a government directive that 5 per cent of Bank loan portfolio be set-aside for small and medium enterprise financing. A separate bank, namely, the Bank for Small Industries and Commerce (BASIC) was set up in 1988 with the objective of financing the small and medium enterprises. There were also attempts to channelise to the sector through public and private banks fund received from international agencies. There were provisions of favorable debt equity ratio, special interest rates and credit guarantee scheme. The central bank also issued directives to both public and private commercial banks regarding working capital loans, use of standardized documentation procedure and time limits for credit sanctioning and loan disbursement. Notwithstanding all these arrangements for financing small and medium enterprises, the actual delivery of institutional credit to this sector has been grossly inadequate. One of the main factors that have hampered flow of institutional finance into small and medium enterprises is a bank pre-occupation with collateral based lending. Traditionally banks have used fixed asset ownership particularly land ownership as the basis for judging credit-worthiness. This puts small and medium enterprises at relative disadvantage as they often cannot put up such collateral for loan. Moreover, whatever collateral they can manage gets used up in taking the term loan leaving them with no means to seek working capital loan from institutional sources. Unlike their large-scale counterparts they cannot use influence and contacts and solve the problem by putting up collateral of dubious valuation. Banks, on their part, also tend to be less flexible about the collateral requirement in the case of the SMEs as they perceive SME loan to be more risky and the cost of monitoring and supervision of small loans to be higher.

Various alternatives to real estate based lending have been suggested for the SMEs. Group guarantee and peer pressure, successfully used in the case of micro-finance, do not appear appropriate for SMEs as these are mostly sole proprietorship units with capital size significantly larger than the amount typically disbursed under micro-finance. Use of assets other than land and building, such as fixture, equipment, vehicles etc as collateral is also a fairly standard practice in institutional finance but is of less use in the case of SMEs as these enterprises usually possess few such non-land assets. Sales proceeds, accounts receivable, inventory etc can be the basis of working capital loan, but this requires proper documentation of the transactions of the SMEs and close monitoring and supervision on the part of the lending institutions. Because of the informal nature of many SME transactions and high cost of small loan administration, use of such movable asset for working capital lending will involve certain difficulties.

SMEs as these enterprises usually possess few such non-land assets, Sales proceeds, accounts receivable, inventory etc can be the basis of working capital loan, but this requires proper documentation of the transactions of the SMEs and close monitoring and supervision on the part of the lending institutions. Because of the informal nature of many SME transactions and high cost of small loan administration, use of such movable asset for working capital lending will involve certain difficulties.

Financial institutions could significantly reduce the risk when they are lending to SMEs without real estate based collateral if they (a) pre-screen SMEs on the basis of cash flow statements and information from business service providers and receivers to assess track records of firms and their ability to repay in future, and (b) implement close monitoring and supervision in the post-disbursement stage. In such cases, appropriate credit guarantee schemes will need to be devised for covering the lending institutions both for the risk involved as well as for the additional cost of loan administration.

In 2003-04, Bangladesh Bank set up a TK. 10.0 billion refinancing scheme for credit to SMEs. Bangladesh Bank charges participating institutions 5% interest rate while the lending institutions decide on the lending rate of interest. This provides these institutions with the scope of attempting lending to SMEs without real estate based collateral as their risks will be covered through refinancing facility and they can accommodate any additional cost of loan administration through an appropriate spread between the borrowing and the lending rate. Because of the initial success of the program, government raised the amount to Tk.25. 0 billion in the national budget 2004-05.

Beside this, IDA has provided US$ 10 million to Enterprise Growth and Bank Modernization Project (EGBMP) during FY2004-5. More over, ADB has finalized an agreement with Bangladesh Bank to provide additional US$ 30 Million to this sector. These huge resources would strengthen the financial program of EGBMP. This would result in employment generation in one hand and enhancement of purchasing power of the poor on the other hand. Under this program, the financing capabilities of various financial institutions and banks have been enhanced and up to April, 2005 Bangladesh Bank has disbursed Tk.1237.34 million for refinancing. Out of this, the contribution of World Bank was Tk.237.26 million while that of Bangladesh Bank was Tk. 999.98 million. Detail refinancing activities of Bangladesh Bank to various financial institutions and banks is shown at Table-5 below:

Table - 5: Refinancing activities of BB and other Bank and financial Institutes.

Name of the Banks/ FIs Refinanced

Amount Refinanced (In Million/ Taka)

No. of Beneficiary Enterprises

IDA Portion (included in the main calculation

Banks

Working Capital

Mid Term

Long Term

Total

 

 

National Credit & Commerce Bank Ltd.

15.64

77.50

-

93.14

228

 

Jamuna Bank Ltd.

-

4.00

-

4

1

 

National Bank Ltd

4

-

-

4

1

 

One Bank Ltd

5.8

24.49

-

20.29

69

 

The Premier Bank Ltd.

57.931

16.55

6.63

81.106

84

 

BRAC Bank Ltd

38.05

502.00

-

540.05

3551

219.75

South East Bank Ltd

27.90

1.50

 

29.4

32

 

Sub-Total

149.321

626.04

6.63

781.986

1766

219.75

Non-Financial Institutions

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uttara Finance & Investment Ltd

7.76

45.10

55.54

108.401

59

 

Prime Finance & Investment Ltd

14

14.00

5.59

33.848

17

 

Midas Financing Ltd

0.5

106.26

39.59

148.345

245

 

Fidelity Assets & Securities Co.Ltd*

 

0.80

 

0.80

1

0.6

IDLC of Bangladesh

 

17.85

13.48

31.33

20

16.91

Phoenix Leasing Co.Ltd

1.2

15.01

37.07

54.183

24

 

United Leasing Co.Ltd

 

29.87

49.78

79.65

58

 

Vanik Bangladesh Ltd

0.3

0.50

 

0.8

2

 

Sub-Total

23.76

230.09

201.41

455.257

426

17.51

Grand Total

173.081

856.13

208.04

1237.24

2192

237.26

(Source: Bangladesh Bank)     * Figures with asterisk received refinance from IDA funding    

Note: Total Amount refinanced   Tk. 1237.24   million

Bangladesh Bank portion             Tk.   999.98  million

IDA Portion                              Tk.    237.26   million

It would he seen from the above Table that up to April 2005 Bangladesh Bank distributed Tk.1237.24 million as refinancing to 7 banks and 8 other financial institutions. It may be mentioned that the same amount of money was distributed by the above banks and financial institutions to 2192 SMEs earlier as loan. Out of the total loan Tk.173.08 million has been provided as working capital, T k. 856.13 million as mid-term loan and Tk. 208.04 million as long-term loan. About 18 banks and financial institutions have so far signed agreements with the central bank to get access to the refinancing facility. The central bank to get access to the refinancing facility. The central bank gave refinance of about TK. 2.07 billion to seven banks and nine financial institutions form the fund. The banks have so far financed some 3094 SMEs. The ADB has ploughed into some $ 50 million to the government under its Small and Medium Enterprise Sector Development program of the total $ 15 million is provided for SME sector policy and institutional restructuring and $ 5 million as technical assistance for capacity building and training. The rest $ 30 million went to the central bank's enterprise fund.

Historically, the commercial banks have been used as the exclusive conduits of funds for the SMEs. There is a strong case for exploring other possible conduits such as NGOs, who have success stories not only with micro finance but also with regard to credit to SMEs albeit in a limited way. As they are more developmental in character than commercial banks which are primarily profit oriented, this may help try out lending to SMEs without real estate based collateral and without having to reduce vigilance in pre and post lending stages.

The lack of access of SMEs to institutional finance is observed to be even higher when it comes to women owned or women managed enterprises. There is a general trend towards rise in women entrepreneurship in Bangladesh, but women trade bodies claim that social acceptability of this trend is not reflected in the attitude of the lending agencies, which discourages them from seeking institutional finance.

The other major problem SME entrepreneurs face in seeking institutional finance is with regard to the preparation of the project proposal. In spite of directives from the central bank to follow standardized procedure, the loan application process has still remained lengthy and cumbersome. The entrepreneur often lacks the ability to formulate a proper project proposal. Even when he prepares the proposal drawing on outside expert services, there is no guarantee that the proposal will be evaluated properly as the financial institutions themselves lack adequate capability for proper project evaluation.

Loan processing, particularly in the case of public sector banks, involves high transaction costs for borrowers in terms of time and visits needed and unofficial payments made. Because of lack of proper autonomy and accountability, the public sector financial institutions are beset with inflexibility, inefficiency, political interventions and corruption. Since the performance of the bank officials is not properly evaluated they lack the incentive to bring larger number of suitable borrowers, particularly those in the small and medium enterprise sector, within the fold of institutional financing. They adopt a passive and inflexible attitude towards the borrowers either to avoid the risk of making an inappropriate lending or to force the borrower to make side payments for more favorable handling of the loan application. These problems are unlikely to go away without major institutional reforms of the public sector banks.

Another major weakness of business financing in Bangladesh is lack of its modernization for purposes of e-commerce. In the context of an evolving globalize trading system the importance of e-commerce can hardly be overemphasized. But due to the absence of congenial telecommunication facilities and appropriate financial systems, business enterprises particularly SMEs have not taken any initiative towards e-commerce.

Bangladesh faces formidable developmental challenges. With a population density of 928 per square kilometer, it is the most densely populated country leaving aside a number of city-states. Per capita GDP of US$ 440 barely distances Bangladesh from a small number of countries at the very foot of the income scale. About 42 per cent of the population lives on the wrong side of the poverty line. Agriculture accounts for nearly a quarter of the GDP employing more than half of the labor force. About 77 per cent of the population still resides in the rural areas. Although population growth rate has come down to 1.47 per cent, annual growth of labor force is estimated to be 4.3 per cent. With the absorptive capacity of the agricultural sector limited to at most one third of the new entrants to the labor force, the country is faced with the pressing need of creating employment opportunities outside agriculture. The role of SME assumes special importance in this context.

To overcome the hurdles of financing and to make time-based progress 'Local Enterprise Investment Centre' (LEIC) has been launched to facilitate improved access for the Small and Medium Entrepreneurs (SMEs) to capital, innovation, new technologies and business practices by way of establishing partnership with foreign or large local enterprises. Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) and IDLC Bangladesh Limited jointly set up the LEIC to help develop a more vibrant private sector, which will serve as an engine for innovation, structural change and economic growth.

The International Finance Corporation (IFC), the private sector arm of the World Bank Group, has signed an Agreement to issue a local currency guarantee of up to $5 million with United Leasing Company Limited (ULC) in Bangladesh.  Credit enhancement from the proposed guarantee, will assist ULC to borrow the equivalent amount of local currency from Citibank Bangladesh and use the longer tenured funding to further expand its portfolio of leases to the SME sector in Bangladesh. The proposed guarantee will facilitate the mobilization of longer-term local currency financing from the more liquid foreign banks to leasing companies that serve the SME sector.

5. Special initiatives of the government

In the past, the government has attempted to provide SMEs with access to finance through targeted lending. There was a government directive that 5% of a bank’s loan portfolio be set-aside for small and cottage industry financing.

(a) BASIC Bank-- BASIC Bank was established in 1989 to finance small and cottage industries. It is mentioned in its Memorandum of Articles that at least 50% of its loan-able fund should be invested in Small Scale Industries (SSI). In 2003, the bank lent Taka 51.29 billion to SSI sector to a number of 418 projects. The bank offers moderate interest rates on SME lending compared to other private commercial banks and foreign banks. For financing small and cottage industries in the private sector, the Bangladesh Bank has been providing refinance facility to this bank since 1999. A sum of Taka 250 million was disbursed to BASIC in FY 2004 under this scheme.

(b) Palli Karma-Sahayak Foundation (PKSF)- The Government established PKSF in May 1990 to work as an apex organization for the development of micro finance sector in Bangladesh. PKSF is distributing micro-credit among the poor through 225 large and small NGOs. Most of the beneficiaries are women. Government allocated Tk 21.7 billion in FY 2006-07 for this program. In addition, in FY 2006-07, the allocation raised to Tk. 26.7 billion by injecting Tk. 10.0 billion in   “ Special Fund for the Employment of the Hardcore Poor” administered by PKSF. To provide Credit Assistance to Small Entrepreneurs in rural areas, Govt. also increased the allocation in FY 2006-07 to Tk. 15.0 billion by a further allocation of Taka 10.0 billion.

(c) Refinance scheme for small and medium enterprises -- To help overcome the financial constraints of this sector and induce the banks and other financial institutions to provide credit facilities to the SME sector, particularly the small entrepreneurs, Bangladesh Bank introduced a refinance scheme with a special fund of Taka 10 billion effective from May 01 2004. To encourage the banks and financial institutions to provide credit to the SMEs, the Government introduced a Tk. 10. 0 billion Refinancing Scheme through Bangladesh Bank. The World Bank and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) will provide US$ 10 million and US$ 30 million respectively to support this scheme. Till date, 3000 SMEs have received credit under this scheme.  For the development of agro-product processing and software industries, the Government allocated Tk 10.0 billion to Equity Development Fund in the revised budget of FY 2005-06. So far, 212 projects have been financed from this Fund. This fund also enhanced to Tk 20. 0 billion in FY 2006-07 for this Fund. To build up agro-based farm and industries, a credit support to the tune of Tk. 10.0 billion is allocated in the current fiscal year under the Agro-based Industries Assistance Program. In FY 2006-07, the allocation is Tk 15.0 billion to this Program.  Initially, only the small enterprises having fixed investment not exceeding Taka one million will be entitled to have credit facilities up to Taka 0.5 million in individual cases under this scheme. The participating banks and financial institutions will apply their own interest rates on the loans made to the borrowers but Bangladesh Bank will charge Bank Rate (currently it is 5%) to the lender banks and financial institutions under this scheme. Till June 2005, a total number of 2681 enterprises have been financed by different banks and financial institutions under this program. Critiques are saying that only participating financial institutions are getting benefit from this scheme, final borrowers remain out of any direct benefit. They are also saying that this program is also not taking account of micro and small enterprises for special consideration.

(d) Credit Distribution Package—It has been announced by the SME Cell that 80% of total resources available for SME would be allocated specially for small enterprises.

(e) Concept of Lead Bank: It has also been decided by the Cell that in the short run BASIC Bank and BRAC Bank will be working together as lead banks and will be responsible for distribution of the credit and venture capital fund. These two banks will closely work with the previously mentioned Advisory Panel. Over the medium term, this responsibility will devolve to the SME Foundation.

(f) SME Foundation : Asian Development Bank has expressed its interest to support the government to set up a Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) Foundation as part of its country assistance strategy.  Some other development partners will support the SME foundation and it can be an apex body for these industries. The SME is one of the Manila-based lender's priority sectors and the bank would ready to channel more fund if the disbursement and utilization of exiting funds become faster. Over the medium term and beyond (a time-frame of 18 or so months from now), the Government shall form an SME Foundation as a pivotal platform for the delivery of all planning, developmental, financing, awareness-raising, evaluation and advocacy services in the name of all SME development as a crucially-important element of poverty alleviation. The functions of the Foundation would be to provision one-window delivery of all promotional and administrative facilities, including some resources needed for capacity building in appropriate industry association(s) for SMEs in the country.

6. Conclusion and Suggestions

Conclusion

As the experiences of SME finance in Bangladesh suggest, there is critical need for putting in place a credit delivery system that evaluates the credit worthiness of borrowers, on a basis other than fixed asset ownership. The evaluation may require examining transaction records of the borrowers, assessing the value of movable assets etc. There will also be the need for enhanced post disbursement monitoring. An effective SME finance policy will have to cover such enhanced cost of credit administration. In addition to credit guarantee or refinancing facility there will have to be adequate rediscount facility for the primary lender to accommodate these costs. Such credit line also needs to be made available to non-bank institutions such as the NGOs. The financing scheme should also include special provisions for women entrepreneurs.

 Implementation of appropriate policies & strategies is a prerequisite to harness sustainable competitiveness of SMEs around the country. Suggestive remarks have been stipulated in this write up. With that paradigm, proactive policy is essential to enact them. The first step this regard is to make firm’s filly aware of the competitive challenges they have to face. The next step is to help SMEs prepare to meet the challenge by understanding their strengths and weaknesses and providing the inputs they need to help them upgrade. The main inputs are finance, market information, training, infrastructure development, R & D, management tools, technology, skills and links with support institutions.

Suggestions

(1) Uniform Definition of SMEs: There should be a consensus on developing a uniform definition of each category of SMEs with generic classification around the country. It should be given standard industrial code (SIC). Without uniform definition, formulation policy and its implementation are not possible.

(2) Seed Money, Leasing, Venture Capital and Investment Funding: There is a need for improving different aspects of financial services of SMEs, such as seed money, leasing, venture capital and investment funding. There is a lack of long-term loans, interest rates are high, Guarantee/Security issues, exchange risks etc. All these limit the development of SMEs. Finance, both short and long term, should be provided at market cost of capital.

(3) Seeking International Financing: Various international donor agency/bank extends financing to SMEs through National Development Financing Institutions (NDFIs). It is found that they are not explored properly. The procedure of those donor agencies/banks for loan facilities to SMEs through NDFIs may be reviewed and term and conditions may be examined in order to make international financing more accessible to SMEs in the country.

(4) Establishment of Separate Financing Institution/Micro Bank for SMEs: Finance is the main obstacle to the SMEs sector, with no sign of immediate improvement of the situation in Bangladesh. The country should start with ‘something effective’ for industrial development in general and the SMEs sector in particular. Such a step, for example, could be the establishment of a separate Micro Bank. That means a separate financing institution could be developed, with joint ownership of the public and private sector. To make the proposed initiative effective in achieving its goals, experts and resources should be gathered from home and abroad such as from SAARC/Islamic countries or other friendly countries. No concession policy but the principle of market rate of cost of capital should be applied in lending procedure. Another source of finance could be raising fund from share market by flotation of IPO by SME under ‘Group IPO Scheme (GIPS)’. In the case of GIPS, a group of SME would utilize their assets for issuance of public shares to be managed by an independent agency. Finally, fund should be made available through encouragement for setting up ‘Venture Capital’ organization in Bangladesh. The concept of venture capital (VC) has successfully operating in the USA, EU countries, and Canada.

(5) Credit Guarantee Scheme & Financing to SMEs: Financing to SMEs can be successful, if two arrangements can be undertaken: (i) Separate institutions dealing with SMEs loans should be established around the country. They can provide adequate volume of finance, on less strict terms and can supervise the loan repayment process as well. (ii) Credit guarantees schemes. Credit guarantee schemes for SMEs can be an effective means of supporting small enterprise development, especially in Bangladesh where access to credit is constrained for small borrowers spirit in Bangladesh. Entrepreneurial education could be given for grater long-term impact. NPO (National Productivity Organization) has provided training to small entrepreneurs during 1988-92.

 (6) The Role of Donors, particularly IDB:  Donors, particularly IDB, may come forward to assist the financial institutions in alleviating the constraints faced by SMEs, primarily the access to credit and capacity building. Funding support in the form of grant may be sought from IDB for Technical Assistance and Consulting Services for products and skill development for the SMEs. In this area, BSCIC may also be involved for providing promotional and technical support services to the SMEs with funding support of IDB.

(7) Assistance for SMEs from Board of Investments and Export Development Centers: Public sector agencies like Board of Investments and Export Development Centers can also provide useful information to SMEs. They can provide necessary information about trade fairs in member countries as well as training in organization of exhibitions. They can identify foreign buyers and assist local SMEs in establishing contacts with them. Information on changing demand conditions in various international markets can be pro vided and advisory services on exploring trade opportunities can be provided to prospective exporters.

(8) Periodical Professional Training Courses for SMEs & for Entrepreneurship Development: Periodical professional training courses should be arranged for technical staff of SMEs. Moreover training in management of small enterprises and efficient marketing can also provided. Islamic Chamber regularly organizes training workshops on management, marketing, procurement of technologies, quality control system and financing of SMEs, for the benefit of representatives of private enterprises and staff of member chambers in different regions of the Islamic World. Training programme/workshop should be organized for the development of SMEs capabilities to acquire enhanced knowledge and skills about how to choose, use and improve technology. At present, no such institution exists except a project of the BSCIC called ‘SCITI (Small and Cottage Industries Training Institute). IAT, BUET has conducted total eight training programs for the light engineering industries during last several years. Training on different aspects of SMEs activities for entrepreneurs is crucial for the development of an entrepreneurial

 (9) BSCIC to be reorganized: Most entrepreneurs and businessmen express their dissatisfaction about BSCIC. BSCIC fails to provide needed services to the small industries due to manifold reasons; primarily due to its unorganized management. BSCIC has to be reorganized so that enacted policy for SMEs can be implemented to help grow small industries in the country in a better manner. Alternatively, a separate organization such as Small and Medium Enterprise Development Authority (SMEDA) may be established to act as a one-stop consultancy Agency to: (a) act as a body for facilitating policy making for SMEs, (b) provide and facilitate support services for SMEs, (c) act as a resource base for the SMEs, and (d) represent SMEs on domestic and international forums. The authority may be state supported, private or jointly supported organization.

(10) Developing Institutional Network through Public-Private Partnership: The design of most government agencies appears to be overly bureaucratic and unsuitable for effectively supporting SMEs in Bangladesh. As such, re-organization of the design of these agencies has for long been overdue. Public-private sector partnership, by redesigning the existing public agencies, could be developed, developing appropriate institutional network. The objective behind this would be to utilize the strengths of public and private agencies, while neutralizing the limitations, if any, inherent in their existing organizational design.

(11) Establishment of R&D Institute for Enterprise and Entrepreneurship Development, Training and Research Institute: In a country like Bangladesh, where entrepreneurial initiative is rare and shy, a separate institute for enterprise and entrepreneurship development, training and research should be developed. To make it a ‘centre of excellence’ in SMEs development, it should be designed, involving educational institutions, business associations, relevant government bodies, private research agencies, and individual consultants having experience in SMEs development.

(12) Implementation and Monitoring of Policy Measures for SMEs. Only policy prescription is not the end, if it is not implemented through different measures timely and properly. How far policy measures are implemented, along with, what effect - desired or not - such policy measures has had on the development of SMEs should also be monitored from time to time. This monitoring will provide feedback for taking corrective actions, if necessary, to ensure desired effect of the policy adopted. Of course, onus has to be on BSCIC or alternately an independent body can be assigned to do the monitoring of implementation of the policy measures, and possible impact.

References

  1. Ahmed Momtaz Uddin: Globalization and Competitiveness of Bangladesh’s Small scale Industries ( SSIs): An Analysis of the Prospects and Challenges, in CPD/UPL published, Bangladesh facing the Challenges of Globalization, IRBD, 2001
  2. Ahmed Momtaz Uddin: Development of Small-scale Industries in Bangladesh in the New Millennium: Challenges and Opportunities, Asian Affairs, Vol. 21, No.1, Jan-March, 1999.
  3. Asian Development Bank (ADB), Bangladesh: Strategic Issues and Potential Response- Small and Medium EnterpriseDhaka, 2002. Development and Export Expansion,
  4. Asian Development Bank (ADB): High Level Workshop on Strategic Issues and Potential Response Initiatives in the Finance, Industry and Trade Sector, November, 2001, Dhaka.
  5. Bakht, Dr.Jahid, Jobs Opportunities and Business Support (JOBs) Programme: Growth potentials of Small and Medium Enterprises: A Review of Eight Sub-Sectors in Bangladesh: BIDS, for JOBS Sub-sector Study, 1998.
  6. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2004 & 1997:  “Report of the Census of Manufacturing Industries,” Dhaka: BBS.
  7. Hossain, Najmul: Job Opportunities and Business Support (jobs) program: institutional reform and the informal sector (IRIS), University of Maryland at College Park: October 1998, IRIS Center, 2105 Morrill Hall, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.
  8. Miah, Dr. Mohammad Ayub, Additional Secretary, Ministry of Industries, and Government of Bangladesh: Survey on  Entrepreneur Development for Competitive  SMEs: Bangladesh, November 28, 2005 (to be published).
  9. Rajapatirana, S.,1997.    “From the Local to the Global Market:  The Challenges for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises” , Washington, D.C.: The World Bank Group.
  10. Rashid, Lila: Conducive Regulatory Environment in Bangladesh: Bridging the Gap between Micro and SME Finance, Internet version.
  11. Small Enterprise Development Facilities (SEDF/World Bank): The SME Sector: Taking Stock of the Present Situation, MIMEO, Dhaka, 2003.
  12. UNITED NATIONS: Promoting Business and Technology Incubation for Improved Competitiveness of Small and Medium-sized Industries through Application of Modern and Efficient Technologies: New York, 2004 United Nations Publication, Sales no. e.04.ii.f.4 Copyright united nations 2004, ISBN: 92-1-120353-9.
  13. USAID: Bangladesh Enterprise Development Assessment Report, Vol. 1, 2001
  14. Government of Bangladesh. Ministry of Finance, Budget Speech 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07.
  15. The Business Bangladesh, vol - 3, Issue 9, June 2006, page 57
  16. The New Nation, Tuesday 7June 2005.
  17. The Bangladesh observer, December 26, 2005.

 

 

 
Make a Free Website with Yola.